Oklahoma’s Hardline Abortion Law Backfires as Supreme Court Rejects Federal Funds

The Supreme Court recently rejected Oklahoma’s request to reinstate federal funds. The decision was made without any explanation from the justices. Three justices indicated that they would have granted the state’s request, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch.

Oklahoma Family Planning and Birth Control – Government website

Oklahoma had lost over $4 million in federal funding for family planning. The dispute arose because Oklahoma laws now prevent abortion referrals, which are required under federal law.

National Family Planning

The funding was part of Title X, a federal program that supports family planning services. Title X mandates that states offer abortion referrals if requested, which conflicted with Oklahoma’s laws.

Audiobook Cover

This legal battle is influenced by the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson decision, which allowed states to enforce stricter abortion laws. Oklahoma’s law prohibits advising on or providing abortions, leading to the funding cut.

United States Department of Health and Human Services seal

To avoid the funding loss, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) suggested that Oklahoma could give patients a hotline number instead. Oklahoma rejected this alternative, leading to the termination of their grant.

Oklahoma State Capital – Credit Caleb Long

Oklahoma first went to federal courts, but both the district and appellate courts denied their request. These courts agreed with HHS that the state was not complying with federal funding rules.

Demonstration in front of SCOTUS – Provided by Worldmatrix

Oklahoma argued that requiring abortion counseling violated the Constitution’s spending clause. The state claimed Title X did not clearly notify them of these federal requirements when they accepted the funding.

Formal group photograph of the Supreme Court as it was been comprised on June 30, 2022 after Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson joined the Court. The Justices are posed in front of red velvet drapes and arranged by seniority, with five seated and four standing…Seated from left are Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., and Justices Samuel A. Alito and Elena Kagan. .Standing from left are Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh, and Ketanji Brown Jackson…Credit: Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States.

The state also argued that the Weldon Amendment, a federal law, protected them from having to refer patients for abortions. This amendment prohibits discrimination against healthcare providers who refuse to provide such referrals.

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris – Wikimedia

The Biden administration, represented by Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, urged the Supreme Court to reject Oklahoma’s request. Prelogar argued that the case had minimal stakes since it only involved a single grant.

Wikipedia

The Supreme Court’s refusal to reinstate the funds means Oklahoma will lose its Title X funding while the case continues in lower courts. The dispute highlights the ongoing tensions between state and federal laws on abortion.